TAKE Action on the “King Amendment”
Contact your Senators and US Representative and tell them not to allow the “King Amendment” in the Farm Bill. This is not only a food safety issue but also a state’s rights issue and animal welfare issue. Representative Steve King, (Iowa) has a long history of working to stifle animal protection laws, is trying to weaken state animal protection measures through an amendment to the 2013 Farm Bill.
The so-called “King Amendment” (Sec. 11312 of H.R. 2642) has already passed the House and is therefore under consideration as the conference committee seeks to reconcile the House and Senate versions of the Farm Bill. If the amendment is allowed to stand and is adopted into law, it will disrupt advancements that have been made in animal protection throughout the country.
Some of the State laws include those that stop shark finning, horse slaughter, intense animal confinement, and many other cruel practices will be invalidated. The amendment is so broadly worded, in fact, that it could adversely impact not only the development of animal welfare measures, but also food safety, worker protection, and environmental quality standards.
There is a short fuse on this!
Tell your legislators how you feel about this (not everyone who clicks this link will be able to send comments as this link is to those legislators on the 2013 Farm Bill conference committee – so click the link to find out if your legislator is on the committee and send your comments to them): HERE
Read what 14 law professors said about the King Amendment:
Law Professors Voice Concerns Over Farm Bill’s King Amendment
U.S. Rep. Steve King’s (R-IA) “Protect Interstate Commerce Act” has many folks biting their nails. Various groups have been expressing their concern about what the amendment to the long-awaited Farm Bill – which will not be finalized before January – could mean for states’ rights, the environment, animal welfare and food safety.
Late last week, 14 law professors from across the country weighed in on the potential impacts of the amendment, which would forbid any state from imposing its own higher standards or conditions on food produced or manufactured in another state.
In a letter sent to the Farm Bill’s top four conferees, the law professors wrote that “should the Amendment pass, there is a significant likelihood that many state agricultural laws across the country will be nullified, that public health and safety will be threatened, and that the Amendment could ultimately be deemed unconstitutional.”
At POLITICO’s Pro Agriculture Launch Event in November, King said that his amendment isn’t a threat to food safety because “you would hear from out states, you’d hear from the USDA, you’d hear from the FDA, or you would hear from out state veterinarians or state secretaries of agriculture if that was an issue.”
King also said that the possibility his amendment could nullify as many as 176 state laws is “not true. … We can only find one that we’re confident of, and that’s California’s [law regulating eggs from hens in a minimum cage size], which is only the regulation of out-of-state producers, and it looks like there may also be one in Michigan that does the same thing as California’s.”
“Although the exact number of laws that might be affected cannot be determined,” the law professors wrote, “we believe Representative King’s oft-repeated assertion that the law is limited to egg laws in California and a handful of similar humane laws is patently false.”
The law professors used Maryland’s ban on the use of arsenic in poultry feed as one example of how the King Amendment could play out. Under one interpretation, Maryland could not ban the sale of out-of-state feed because it contained arsenic. Under another interpretation, “Maryland would not even be able to protect its own citizens from exposure to arsenic from feed produced within the state’s borders.”
The signatories to the letter were professors at 13 university law schools, including UCLA, Cornell, Harvard, Northwestern, George Washington and Michigan State.
© Food Safety News
To make comments visit this site:
Law Professors Voice Concerns Over Farm Bill’s King Amendment | Food Safety News.
Related articles
- Experts blast House bid to nullify state’s humane-farm law (sfgate.com)
- Farm bill takes aim at state animal welfare laws (fresnobee.com)
- Amendment To Farm Bill Could Erode State Sovereignty And End Humane Farming Standards (libertycrier.com)
- Legal Experts Slam Controversial Farm Bill Amendment In Letter To Congress (huffingtonpost.com)
- King Amendment resists change (gogreennation.org)
- Amendment To Farm Bill Could Be End To Humane Farming Standards (huffingtonpost.com)
- What Would Cost $1 Trillion, Unravel GMO Labeling Laws, Ruin Small Farmers, and Affect Sixteen Million Jobs? (anh-usa.org)
- A Royal Pain (hsus.typepad.com)
- King: Time running out for farm bill agreement (siouxcityjournal.com)Steve King: Last Man Standing (Photo credit: DonkeyHotey)
- Stop The King Amendment (ivoter.net)
I object to Poisen being put in my food
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Poor as Folk.
LikeLike
Thanks so much for sharing this excellent info! I’m seeking forward to see much more posts! efkdbdcfdbge
LikeLike